<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Maven &#8211; Curse or Blessing?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techblog.molindo.at/2007/10/maven-curse-or-blessing.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techblog.molindo.at/2007/10/maven-curse-or-blessing.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=maven-curse-or-blessing</link>
	<description>Molindo Techblog – formerly known as talk-on-tech.blogspot.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:48:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eelco Hillenius</title>
		<link>http://techblog.molindo.at/2007/10/maven-curse-or-blessing.html#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>Eelco Hillenius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 16:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.molindo.at/2007/10/maven-curse-or-blessing.html#comment-103</guid>
		<description>Imho, compared to Ant, Maven is a blessing. Ant is a great tool, and as it isn&#039;t in your way, it might be easier to use for your own projects. But the part that I like about Maven is that there is finally some uniformity with a lot of open source projects. Instead of being forced to figure out the most exotic project layouts and a zillion build properties like was the case when you wanted to build a project in the past, you can now build projects much easier.Also, forcing it&#039;s users to work with versioned libs is a good thing. I know you can achieve the same with Ant, but the fact is that most Ant based projects simply don&#039;t, even not today.As a final remark: Ivy is quite nice. It is new as an Ant project, but the project exists for a few years already. In fact, I&#039;ve used it in a project myself more than two years ago.Final, final remark: did you ever look at Buildr (http://buildr.rubyforge.org/)? Looks very promising to me, though I didn&#039;t look into how their repositories work yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imho, compared to Ant, Maven is a blessing. Ant is a great tool, and as it isn&#8217;t in your way, it might be easier to use for your own projects. But the part that I like about Maven is that there is finally some uniformity with a lot of open source projects. Instead of being forced to figure out the most exotic project layouts and a zillion build properties like was the case when you wanted to build a project in the past, you can now build projects much easier.Also, forcing it&#8217;s users to work with versioned libs is a good thing. I know you can achieve the same with Ant, but the fact is that most Ant based projects simply don&#8217;t, even not today.As a final remark: Ivy is quite nice. It is new as an Ant project, but the project exists for a few years already. In fact, I&#8217;ve used it in a project myself more than two years ago.Final, final remark: did you ever look at Buildr (<a href="http://buildr.rubyforge.org/" rel="nofollow">http://buildr.rubyforge.org/</a>)? Looks very promising to me, though I didn&#8217;t look into how their repositories work yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

